Sunday, October 09, 2005

Greetings from Earl Bennett, President of P.A.S.A.

Hello Readers, I am the head of the organization known as the Philadelphia Area Space Alliance. We have an acronym that is the same as several other groups but our primary concern is the promotion and groundwork needed for humanity to live and flourish beyond the Earth. Besides being President, I am also technical director and thus look into some of the engineering possibilities that could make this possible. This includes, but is not limited to, spacecraft power plants, communications systems, and the subsidiary systems that will be needed, in my opinion, to allow the goal to be reached. Nano Tech yes, Star Trek, not possible yet. I will post more as time goes by including our meeting notes: We have monthly meetings at Liberty One in center city Philadelphia on the third Saturday of the month in the Food Court. Time: 1 to 3 p.m.. Location: towards the 17th Street side of the court, in the right alcove area.

Sunday, October 02, 2005

Xities or the Cities of the Future in Space

Philadelphia October 2, 2005 Peter Kokh writes in last month’s Moon Miner Manifesto, see, about Xities, the cities of the future in space. Mr. Kokh envisions these Xities as self sufficient in producing their own breathable atmosphere, food, and clean water. Mr. Kokh distinguishes all the cities of the Earth even in the future from the modern Xities which he believes will reside only outside of the Earth’s atmosphere. I’m not sure I even like Mr. Kokh’s concept of Xities. They remind me most of medieval walled cities which allowed none of the peasants or slaves to enter or leave, or even change occupations, which were mostly performed for no pay, in bad conditions, and for bad food. Medieval cities were designed to be self-sufficient for water and stored food only in times of war when the cities were besieged. Earth cities, evolved as sites of business both trade and manufacture. The health both physically and economically of Earth cities and most likely the Xities will depend on the health of the surrounding countryside and vice versa. Early cities never lacked fresh air, or did they? Medieval cities all depended on burning wood, peat, dung or coal for heat. As late as the 1900’s London, a city which predates medieval times, was noted for foul smelling, sulfurous, choking fogs resulting from thousands of coal and wood fireplaces in the city. Carbon monoxide poisoning and skin and lung cancers from smoky fumes from ones own and one’s neighbors smoking fireplaces were common as were often lethal fires. There was no water treatment in medieval cities. In Venice, also another city which predates medieval times, still has most toilets flush directly into the lagoon which forms most of the streets in Venice. Many tourists still avoid eating seafood in Venice due to fear of cholera, and the hepatitises which used to be very common there, but probably less common than in the neighboring cities as the Venetian water supply came from rain water which is free of cholera if the water delivery system remains free of waste water. Unfortunately, Mr. Kokh doesn’t understand modern water recycling terms which grade water as white, gray, and black. White water is generally considered to be pure and uncontaminated with any chemicals. Rain water running directly into a gutter or storm drain without picking up any silt or soil run off would be white water. Gray water would be any water that might contain light contamination with chemicals such as dishwashing detergent, car washing detergent, or light contamination with harmless and biodegradable agricultural or industrial chemicals but contains no human or animal wastes. Gray water is water you could put directly on your garden without fear it would harm the plants, soil, or contaminate with disease organisms any plants grown there. Black water would be toilet, shower, or hand washing, or clothes washing water which might be contaminated with human or plant pathogens. Black water would also be considered as any which might contain animal wastes or chemical contamination with harmful or persistent chemicals. Until late in the 19th century, water recycling was at best haphazard. Yes, there were sewer systems back 2500 years ago in the Indus valley, now Pakistan. But the concept of diseases acquired from bad water was probably still lacking back then, even there. The sewer systems probably resulted from the desire of the nobles to be able to get out of their carriages without sinking into mud in the city streets, which resulted from the city residents tossing contents of their chamber pots and kitchen wastes into the city streets. The streams the sewers emptied into were probably still fished and drunk from. In this country, the common water borne diseases of cholera and typhoid were not recognized as related to contaminated drinking water until well into the 20th century. Many physicians remained unconvinced of the germ theory of disease into the 1910's. The Romans some 2000 years ago had some continuously flushing toilets. Fresh, continuously flowing water was channeled through communal toilets in the local baths. But the Romans still enjoyed eating the oysters from London’s river Thames, which was then the sewer system of London. However, as back then, the water was never chlorinated, the sewer systems’ and streams’ microbes were able to release the nitrogen from the wastes faster than in most modern treatment systems. Although modern water treatment plants use black water recycling microbes quite resistant to common chlorine contents of water, some may still be very susceptible to being destroyed by modern agricultural chemical contaminants and difficult to maintain in some water treatment systems. Although the microbes may remove the nitrogen very effectively and cheaply, they do not necessarily remove all the pathogens, or many other chemical contaminants besides the nitrogen, so do not constitute a complete recycling system by themselves. Let me point out, the Wolverton system, see does not convert toilet wastes into anything drinkable or even ready to be let out of a sewer system or used directly on the garden. Nor, judging from the data, does the Wolverton system remove all the nitrogenous waste from the effluent. Unfortunately, most of the details of the system are lacking from the site, which sells Dr. Wolverton’s book. Dr. Wolverton worked for NASA who looked into water recycling systems starting in the 1970’s. Dr. Wolverton’s site also has some data on common indoor air pollutants, and references to some of the free NASA maintained sites for information on biological reduction of air and water pollutants. The web pages of Mr. Wolverton and the NASA sites are informative but neither the free NASA sites nor Mr. Wolverton’s book can be considered current state of the art. Atmosphere recycling these days is probably not quite as advanced as water recycling systems were in the late 19th century. Everybody who studies these problems know Biosphere I and Biosphere II that attempted to recycle atmosphere in closed systems using only biological methods were total failures. They were designed to recycle the atmosphere, water and nutrients for a few human residents and some animals. The walls of Biosphere II which were unfinished concrete absorbed oxygen. Plants died. Oxygen became so scarce the residents took to surreptitiously opening the dome to get an influx of oxygen. Although the plants in the Biospheres may well have been capable of recycling enough oxygen to keep the people alive, if all the plants had lived, the amount of oxygen consumed by decomposing wastes and the farm animals may not have been totally provided for even if all the plants had lived. But there was a lot learned from these failures. NASA has done some experiments with biological atmosphere recycling systems for use on the International Space Station and when we go back to the Moon. It is now known that one cubic meter of growing wheat supplies enough oxygen to support one adult man. Likewise one aspen tree in full leaf produces enough oxygen to support one adult man. But those are just two species of plants out of millions. NASA has made commitments to using renewable atmosphere recycling systems starting in 2008 for the International Space Station, but what they are going to be has not yet been published on the free areas of the NASA site. Most people who raise plants in their apartments or houses are not raising them for oxygen production or carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide and other pollutant cleaning they provide. After all how many philodendron leaves does it take to supply the oxygen for one person? Or cactus pads? Or gallons of plankton? Or quarts of fresh water algae? And in what lighting conditions? With what fertilizers or lack thereof? Who knows? I personally am convinced most of the available oxygen in center city Philadelphia was produced by the algae on the walls of the buildings and subways. Unfortunately, they washed the subway walls once back in 1976 for the bicentennial with something that actually killed off most of the algae growing there. Since then, the oxygen supply in the subways probably dropped by half and the carbon monoxide levels doubled. If NASA has done the research on how many philodendron leaves or square feet of algae coated walls it takes to produce the oxygen for one person, they haven’t published that data, at least not on the information available to the general public on their free web pages. And now when I want to grow freshwater algae to feed to my fish, I have to send away mail order to another state for freshwater algae cultures to get any microalgae to produce oxygen and food for my fish. I used to just go down into the subways and take a swab off the subway walls to get my algae growing in a new tank. Instead of fresh smelling, oxygen producing algae, they now have just some foul smelling, mildew growing on the walls of the subways. Although like most Philadelphians, I spend no small amount of time bad mouthing this city in particular and most cities in general, Philadelphia has the biggest park system within the city borders of any American city complete with a wild deer herd also usually mostly found within city limits. Being wild, the deer herd roams at will in and out of the city. There also is an operating agricultural school and working farm within city limits. But in addition to the traditional agriculture within the city, there are a number of businesses that produce food commercially using hydroponics within the city limits. Philadelphia is far from being self sufficient in food or water recycling, but the local farms provide much of the food sold in the city. In addition there are numerous city gardens in public spaces organized and assisted by the Pennsylvania horticultural society. But one thing is known, however, no matter where we go in space, to what strange planets and in what massive space ships there will be plants going with us. On the International Space Station, that has all its air recycled by mechanical recyclers, the astronauts kept and maintained an onion plant, that sprouted spontaneously from the fresh food shipped up on one of their regular resupply shipments, just to have something green and living sharing their living space. Somehow, I never pictured the International Space Station as a possible home for anyone until I heard they had a plant. Once they had a plant, kept not for some experiment, but just because it was alive and green, the International Space Station was no longer just an outpost. It was a home. By Janice Guidotti, M.D., PASA member(Philadelphia Area Space Alliance)

Saturday, August 06, 2005

The PASA List: The Top Ten Things We Are Doing Wrong in Promoting the Space Frontier

Commentary by Mitchell Gordon, VP, PASA (Phila. Area Space Alliance) 10. Stop concentrating on trying to celebrate Space Day or Space Week in July (the month of the Apollo 11 mission). The college kids are not around and their parents are on vacation. Better to concentrate your efforts on World Space Week, coordinated by the United Nations, and held each year from October 4 -10, an ideal time for public relations activity. 9. Stop always asking those who can least afford it (the kids) to enroll in space camp. Establish a Space Lottery Fund to award kids with camp scholarships. The fund could also be used to fund citizen trips to space. 8. End the regional bias that has tipped space development too far in favor of the southern and western portions of the United States. Such bias promotes greater citizen apathy in the central and northeast regions of the country when it comes to space ventures, as shown by the lack of space studies curriculums in major college centers like Philadelphia. More national meetings of space engineers and related scientists need to be held in places other than Florida, Texas, and California. 7. Modern art wings of major art museums have virtually ignored fifty years of drama in the space frontier. Never has so great an undertaking by humankind been so ignored by the artist community. Between the artists and the space activists, somebody is doing something wrong somewhere. At this rate the 2007 golden anniversary year of space exploration will be all but ignored in the art community, save for the science museums. Space art may be predominantly illustration rather than fine art, but this does not justify the absence of work depicting space undertakings by the artist community. Art is an important public relations tool, and some space activists may have to become artists to fill the void. Thank God for artist Robert McCall. 6. If NASA was an entrepreneur, diamonds would be relegated to museums and university geology labs. Get this straight: Space rock is the spice of the 21st century. Shaped, polished, certified and sold, these meteorites, moon and Mars stones, and asteroidal gems can bring in billions of dollars in sales and taxes over the years. I can think of no one--male or female--who would not want a space stone as part of their jewelry collection. Such rings, pendants, pins and cufflinks from new jewelry-tech industries will help sell the quest for space. 5. Imagine if the only way to fly was to go to Florida (if you live east of the Mississippi) or California (if you live west of the Mississippi). At the minimum, we will need seven regional space bases in the country from the following regions: Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast (Kennedy Space Center), South Central, Central, Southwest, and Northwest. Designating such bases now in the regions mentioned will set the bureaucratic process in motion so that when the technology becomes acceptable and available, a U.S. Space Transit Line will be in place.Weather conditions may close some bases during winter intervals, but no one is shutting down baseball because of winter weather. Until they are available for space flights, the American Seven locations can serve as space learning centers and good public relations. Orbital takeoffs may not be optimal, but if optimal flight was the determining factor alone, many jet flights to various cities would be shut down. 4. We take short shots into space and overlook a systems approach. Best proof: we have not been back to the moon in over thirty years. Space development in the near future will be a nine-venue system, in which all parts will matter and will need staying power: a. Earth auxiliaries: space camps, bases, science museums and space studies at schools. b. Suborbital flights: leisure and learning experiences featuring weightlessness. c. Earth orbit: space station(s) and hotel(s) plus satellite networks. d. L5 habitats and factories between the Earth and the moon. e. Moonbase(s). f. Mars colony. g. Asteroidal mining and research stations. h. Jupiter moonbase. i. Saturn lunar outpost. 3. Spinoffs from space may be helpful to consumers, but they lack the boldness of masterplans of macroengineering, in which space scientists weigh in on the ways and means to save planet Earth from such things as global warming and the expansion of the deserts. Stop thinking small and think about terraforming our own world. Such a contradiction makes sense if you try to make the dryest places bloom; then take what we have learned to the stars. 2. Space Studies is a curriculum that requires its own career path. Students are often frustrated with trying to find what courses to take to be involved with the final frontier. Colleges and universities need to do a better job to prepare future generations of space enthusiasts. The field should be broad enough to include those who wish to stay on Earth (working at science museums, space camps and learning centers) and those who wish to explore and do research (engineers, biotechnicions and flight crews). 1. Space science has its place, but if NASA had been in charge of opening up the West, we would still only have research scientists west of the Rocky Mountains. We need a fast track toward opening up space hotel modules as part of the International Space Station, or as freestanding habitats in space. We need a symbol that unequivocally states that space is open to all of humanity, and the space hotel is that symbol NASA, get out of the doorway if you cannot lend a hand. Ad astra per Hilton.